10. Accuracy

Dokuz Eylul has established internal rules and a systematic editorial process to ensure the accuracy of its content. These processes are integral to maintaining the credibility and trustworthiness of the media outlet, ensuring that all published information is reliable and factual.

Systematic Editorial Process for Ensuring Accuracy:

Fact-Checking Protocols: All content undergoes rigorous fact-checking before publication. Journalists and editors are responsible for verifying facts, sources, and data through multiple reliable channels, ensuring that information is accurate and up-to-date.

Use of Credible Sources: The guidelines require the use of credible, verified sources for all reporting. Anonymity is granted only under strict conditions, and information from anonymous sources is corroborated with additional evidence to ensure its validity.

Editorial Oversight and Review: Each piece of content is reviewed by section editors and managing editors, who assess the accuracy, consistency, and compliance with editorial standards. This multi-level review process helps catch errors before they reach the public.

Correction Policy: Dokuz Eylul has a clear correction policy in place. If any inaccuracies are identified after publication, corrections are made promptly, and a transparent correction notice is issued to inform the audience of the changes.

Training and Guidelines for Journalists: Regular training sessions and clear editorial guidelines equip journalists with the skills and knowledge needed to maintain high standards of accuracy in their reporting.

These systematic processes and internal rules help ensure that Dokuz Eylul consistently delivers accurate and reliable information, reinforcing its commitment to high-quality journalism.

Dokuz Eylul has established internal rules and a systematic editorial process to ensure that its Editorial Guidelines are consistently adhered to throughout all stages of content creation and publication. These processes are designed to maintain high journalistic standards and uphold the integrity of the media outlet.

Systematic Editorial Process for Adherence to Guidelines:

Clear Editorial Guidelines: Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines are clearly defined and communicated to all staff, including journalists, editors, and contributors. These guidelines cover ethics, accuracy, impartiality, and standards of conduct, providing a framework for all editorial work.

Editorial Oversight and Multi-Level Review: Content goes through a multi-level review process involving section editors, managing editors, and the Chief Editor. Each level of review ensures that the content complies with the Editorial Guidelines before it is approved for publication.

Mandatory Training and Regular Updates: Staff receive regular training on the Editorial Guidelines to stay updated on best practices and ethical standards. This training helps reinforce the importance of adhering to the guidelines and prepares staff to handle complex editorial situations.

Internal Audits and Monitoring: Periodic internal audits are conducted to review editorial practices and identify any deviations from the guidelines. This monitoring helps ensure compliance and provides opportunities to address any issues promptly.

Accountability Mechanisms: Editors and journalists are held accountable for maintaining editorial standards. Clear processes are in place for addressing breaches, including corrective measures and feedback loops to prevent future occurrences.

Role of the Ombudsman: The Ombudsman plays a crucial role in monitoring adherence to the Editorial Guidelines, reviewing complaints, and ensuring that editorial processes align with the outlet’s standards.

These systematic processes and internal rules ensure that Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines are consistently followed, maintaining the outlet’s commitment to ethical and responsible journalism.

Dokuz Eylul has a comprehensive verification process for content, supported by strong editorial oversight to ensure that all published material meets the highest standards of accuracy, reliability, and integrity. This process is integral to maintaining the credibility of the media outlet and upholding its commitment to responsible journalism.

Verification Process for Content:

Fact-Checking and Source Verification: Every piece of content goes through rigorous fact-checking to verify the accuracy of information. Journalists are required to cross-check facts, confirm the reliability of sources, and validate data through multiple reputable sources before submitting their work.

Use of Credible and Multiple Sources: The editorial guidelines emphasize the importance of using multiple, credible sources for every story. Anonymous sources are only used under strict conditions, and their information must be corroborated with additional evidence.

Editorial Oversight: Editorial oversight is a critical part of the verification process. Section editors review all content for factual accuracy, consistency, and alignment with the editorial guidelines. They are responsible for identifying any potential inaccuracies or biases.

Role of Managing Editors and Chief Editor: After the initial review by section editors, managing editors perform a secondary review to ensure that content adheres to the highest journalistic standards. The Chief Editor has the final say on all content, ensuring that it complies with Dokuz Eylul’s standards before publication.

Pre-Publication Review Meetings: For complex or sensitive stories, pre-publication review meetings are conducted where editors and journalists discuss potential issues, verify critical facts, and make necessary adjustments to the content.

Continuous Feedback and Corrections: Post-publication, any feedback or identified errors are addressed promptly, with corrections made transparently to maintain trust with the audience.

This structured verification process, supported by multiple layers of editorial oversight, ensures that Dokuz Eylul’s content is thoroughly vetted and reliable, reinforcing the outlet’s dedication to accurate and responsible journalism.

Dokuz Eylul has a mechanism in place for the periodic review of the effectiveness of the implementation of its Editorial Guidelines within its editorial processes. This review process ensures that the guidelines are consistently applied, and any necessary improvements are made to maintain the highest standards of journalism.

Mechanism for Periodic Review:

Regular Internal Audits: Dokuz Eylul conducts regular internal audits of its editorial processes to assess adherence to the Editorial Guidelines. These audits involve reviewing randomly selected published content to ensure compliance with standards of accuracy, impartiality, and ethical reporting.

Feedback from Editors and Staff: Editors and journalists are encouraged to provide feedback on the editorial processes and the implementation of the guidelines. Regular meetings and workshops are held to discuss challenges, share best practices, and identify areas for improvement.

Role of the Ombudsman: The Ombudsman plays a crucial role in monitoring adherence to the guidelines. The Ombudsman reviews public complaints and conducts evaluations of editorial decisions to ensure that the guidelines are being followed effectively.

Analysis of Corrections and Complaints: A periodic analysis of corrections made to published content and complaints received from the public is conducted. This analysis helps identify patterns and areas where the editorial process may need strengthening.

Continuous Training and Updates: To ensure the ongoing relevance and effectiveness of the Editorial Guidelines, staff training sessions are regularly updated based on the findings from reviews and audits. This keeps the editorial team aligned with best practices and evolving standards.

Annual Review Reports: An annual report is prepared summarizing the findings from internal reviews, feedback, and analysis. This report is used to make strategic adjustments to the editorial processes and to update the guidelines as necessary.

These mechanisms ensure that Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines are not only implemented effectively but are continuously reviewed and refined to uphold the integrity and quality of its journalism.

Dokuz Eylul’s accountability mechanisms, both internal and external, are subject to periodic review to ensure their effectiveness and relevance. These reviews are essential to maintaining high standards of transparency, accountability, and journalistic integrity.

Periodic Review of Accountability Mechanisms:

Internal Accountability Reviews: Dokuz Eylul conducts regular reviews of its internal accountability processes, including the roles of the editorial oversight, the Ombudsman, and complaint management systems. These reviews assess how effectively the internal mechanisms handle feedback, corrections, and adherence to ethical standards.

Feedback and Evaluation from Staff: Editors, journalists, and other staff members provide feedback on the internal accountability processes through regular meetings and surveys. This input helps identify any shortcomings and areas for improvement in managing accountability.

External Evaluations: If Dokuz Eylul participates in any external accountability bodies, such as press councils or independent auditors, these bodies also undergo periodic assessments to ensure their independence, impartiality, and effectiveness. Dokuz Eylul actively reviews its participation in these external mechanisms to ensure they continue to meet high standards.

Analysis of Public Complaints and Corrections: Analyzing patterns in public complaints, corrections, and editorial responses helps evaluate the performance of accountability mechanisms. This analysis informs any adjustments needed to improve responsiveness and transparency.

Annual Accountability Reports: An annual report summarizing the findings from internal and external reviews is prepared, highlighting areas of success and identifying areas needing enhancement. This report guides strategic adjustments to ensure accountability mechanisms remain robust.

Commitment to Continuous Improvement: Dokuz Eylul is committed to continuously refining its accountability processes based on periodic review findings, ensuring that both internal and external mechanisms are aligned with best practices in journalism.

These periodic reviews help ensure that Dokuz Eylul’s accountability mechanisms remain effective, transparent, and trusted by both the editorial team and the public.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines explicitly require that all statistics used in reporting must be sourced from credible sources and thoroughly verified before publication. This requirement is part of the media outlet’s commitment to maintaining accuracy and reliability in its journalism.

Requirements for Sourcing and Verifying Statistics:

Use of Credible Sources: The guidelines mandate that statistics must be obtained from reputable and authoritative sources, such as government agencies, recognized research institutions, academic studies, and other verified data providers. The use of statistics from unverified or unreliable sources is strictly prohibited.

Verification Process: Journalists and editors are required to cross-check statistical data with multiple sources whenever possible. This process includes validating figures against official reports, peer-reviewed publications, or directly contacting experts for confirmation.

Citation of Sources: All statistics must be accompanied by clear citations, indicating the original source of the data. This transparency allows readers to assess the credibility of the information and ensures that the outlet adheres to high standards of accuracy.

Editorial Oversight: Editors play a crucial role in reviewing statistical data for accuracy. They are responsible for checking that all statistics are correctly interpreted, presented in context, and not used in a misleading manner.

Updates and Corrections: In the event that new information becomes available or if an error in statistical reporting is identified, the guidelines require that updates and corrections be made promptly, with clear communication to the audience.

These measures ensure that Dokuz Eylul’s reporting is based on accurate, reliable, and well-verified statistical information, reinforcing the outlet’s dedication to responsible and ethical journalism.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines require that all external photographs, video, and audio content used in reporting must be properly sourced and thoroughly verified. This ensures that all multimedia content adheres to the highest standards of accuracy, authenticity, and ethical journalism.

Requirements for Sourcing and Verifying External Multimedia Content:

Credible Sourcing: The guidelines mandate that all external multimedia content, including photographs, video, and audio, must be sourced from reputable and credible providers. This includes verified news agencies, licensed stock platforms, official sources, and original content creators. The use of unverified or questionable sources is strictly prohibited.

Verification of Authenticity: Before publication, all external multimedia content must be verified for authenticity. This includes checking metadata, consulting reverse image or video search tools, and cross-referencing with reliable sources to confirm the content’s origin, date, and context.

Permission and Licensing: Proper permission and licensing are required for all external multimedia content. The guidelines emphasize the importance of obtaining legal rights to use the content, ensuring compliance with copyright laws, and giving appropriate credit to the original creators.

Editorial Oversight: Editors are responsible for reviewing all external multimedia content to ensure it aligns with the context of the story and meets the editorial standards. They must verify that the content has not been manipulated or used in a misleading way.

Transparency and Attribution: The guidelines require clear attribution of all external multimedia content, including the source and any relevant details about the content’s verification. This transparency helps maintain trust with the audience and upholds journalistic integrity.

Corrections and Updates: In the event that external multimedia content is found to be inaccurate or misrepresented, corrections must be made promptly, and the audience should be informed of the updates.

These measures ensure that all external photographs, video, and audio content used by Dokuz Eylul are sourced responsibly and verified for accuracy, reflecting the outlet’s commitment to ethical and reliable journalism.

Dokuz Eylul’s editorial practices include the identification of individual journalists, including external contributors, through bylines or recorded publishing mechanisms. This approach ensures transparency, accountability, and recognition of the work of each journalist involved in content creation.

Identification of Journalists and Contributors:

Bylines for Journalists: Articles, reports, and other content published by Dokuz Eylul typically include bylines that clearly identify the journalist or contributor responsible for the work. This allows readers to know who produced the content and provides recognition to the journalists for their efforts.

Identification of External Contributors: When content is produced by external sources, such as freelance journalists, photographers, or other contributors, their names are included in bylines or credits to acknowledge their work and maintain transparency.

Recording in Publishing Mechanisms: All content published by Dokuz Eylul is recorded in the outlet’s publishing system, which tracks the authorship and contributions of each piece. This internal record-keeping ensures that information about who created or contributed to the content can be accessed when needed.

Accountability and Transparency: Identifying journalists and contributors fosters accountability and encourages adherence to ethical standards, as it provides a direct link between the content and the individual responsible for it.

Corrections and Follow-Ups: In cases where corrections or follow-ups are needed, having clear identification of the original journalist or contributor allows for accurate updates and communication with the audience.

These practices ensure that Dokuz Eylul maintains transparency in its publishing processes and provides proper credit and accountability for all contributors.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines ensure that any constraints on location reporting are clearly explained either within the report itself or in the context of its publication. This practice maintains transparency with the audience and provides context for any limitations that may affect the reporting.

Guidelines on Explaining Constraints in Location Reporting:

Transparency About Constraints: If a journalist is unable to report directly from a location due to safety concerns, access restrictions, or other logistical challenges, the guidelines require that this limitation be disclosed in the report. This ensures that readers are fully informed about the conditions under which the information was gathered.

Contextual Explanation: The report or accompanying notes should provide a clear explanation of why location-based constraints exist, such as government-imposed restrictions, conflict zones, or health and safety risks. This helps the audience understand the context of the reporting and any potential impact on the content’s completeness.

Use of Verified Secondary Sources: When direct reporting is constrained, the guidelines emphasize the importance of using verified secondary sources, such as local contacts, official statements, or reputable third-party reports. These sources must be clearly identified to maintain the credibility of the report.

Editorial Oversight: Editors are responsible for ensuring that any constraints on location reporting are adequately explained in the publication. They review the content to confirm that the reasons for any limitations are communicated transparently to the audience.

Audience Trust and Clarity: By openly addressing constraints, Dokuz Eylul upholds its commitment to honest reporting, which helps maintain trust with its audience even when direct access to information is limited.

These guidelines ensure that any constraints on location reporting are not hidden but instead explained to provide the necessary context for the audience.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines require full transparency when location reporting has been facilitated by an external body. This policy ensures that the audience is aware of any potential influences or constraints that may affect the objectivity of the report.

Guidelines on Transparency in Location Reporting Facilitated by External Bodies:

Disclosure of External Facilitation: The guidelines mandate that any external facilitation, such as access provided by governments, organizations, companies, or other entities, must be disclosed in the report. This disclosure helps the audience understand the context of the reporting and any potential biases that may arise.

Clear Attribution: When external bodies assist with travel, access to restricted areas, or logistical support, the nature of this assistance must be clearly stated within the report. This includes specifying the type of support provided, such as transportation, accommodation, or guided access.

Assessment of Independence: The editorial team assesses the degree of independence retained during the reporting process. If the external body imposes any restrictions or guidelines on what can be reported, these limitations must also be disclosed to maintain transparency.

Editorial Oversight: Editors are responsible for ensuring that reports facilitated by external bodies include the necessary disclosures. This oversight helps maintain the integrity of the report and ensures compliance with the Editorial Guidelines.

Audience Trust and Accountability: By being transparent about external facilitation, Dokuz Eylul reinforces its commitment to ethical journalism and maintains trust with its audience. Openly addressing these relationships helps the audience critically assess the content.

These guidelines ensure that any facilitation by external bodies is clearly communicated, preserving the objectivity and credibility of Dokuz Eylul’s journalism.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines require that any content generated, wholly or partly, by means of AI or algorithmic processes be clearly indicated to ensure transparency and maintain trust with the audience. This policy reflects the media outlet’s commitment to ethical journalism and full disclosure of how content is produced.

Guidelines on AI and Algorithmic Content Generation:

Clear Disclosure of AI Use: The guidelines mandate that any use of AI or algorithmic tools in the creation of content, such as text, images, audio, or video, must be explicitly disclosed. This includes automated reporting, data analysis, or content generation processes.

Labelling and Attribution: Content generated or assisted by AI is clearly labelled, either within the article or in an accompanying note, stating the role of AI in its production. This allows the audience to understand the extent of human versus machine involvement.

Verification and Editorial Oversight: Even when AI tools are used, the final content must be verified and reviewed by human editors to ensure accuracy, coherence, and compliance with journalistic standards. Editors are responsible for ensuring that AI-generated content does not contain errors or biases.

Transparency and Audience Awareness: The guidelines emphasize the importance of transparency when AI tools are used in storytelling. Disclosing the use of AI helps maintain audience trust and encourages an open dialogue about the evolving role of technology in journalism.

Commitment to Ethical Standards: Dokuz Eylul is committed to ethical standards in AI use, including avoiding misleading the audience about the origin of the content and ensuring that human oversight remains a core part of the editorial process.

These guidelines ensure that any AI-generated content is transparently presented, maintaining the integrity and credibility of Dokuz Eylul’s journalism.

Dokuz Eylul clearly indicates its policy on the use of algorithms for the dissemination and curation of news content to ensure transparency and maintain audience trust. This policy outlines how algorithms are used to manage the distribution of content and the potential impact on what readers see.

Policy on the Use of Algorithms for News Dissemination and Curation:

Transparency of Algorithm Use: Dokuz Eylul is committed to being transparent about its use of algorithms in the curation and dissemination of news. The media outlet provides clear information on how algorithms are employed to sort, recommend, or prioritize content on its platforms.

Clear Indication and Explanation: The policy is outlined on Dokuz Eylul’s website, often found in the ‘About Us’ or ‘Editorial Policies’ sections. This explanation includes details on what types of algorithms are used, such as those for personalized content recommendations or automated content sorting.

Audience Awareness: The guidelines ensure that readers are informed when their experience is being shaped by algorithmic processes. Disclosures may be included directly on content feeds or as part of user settings, allowing the audience to understand the role of algorithms in their news consumption.

Commitment to Fairness and Objectivity: Dokuz Eylul’s policy emphasizes that algorithmic curation is designed to enhance user experience without compromising editorial integrity. The editorial team regularly reviews algorithmic outputs to ensure they align with the outlet’s commitment to fairness, accuracy, and diverse viewpoints.

Feedback and Accountability: The policy encourages audience feedback regarding algorithm-driven content recommendations, allowing readers to report concerns or biases they may encounter. This feedback is used to continuously refine and improve the algorithms used.

Ethical Use of Technology: Dokuz Eylul is dedicated to the ethical use of technology, ensuring that algorithms do not unduly influence the editorial direction and that human oversight remains central to content curation.

By clearly stating its policy on the use of algorithms, Dokuz Eylul upholds its commitment to transparency and accountability in the digital age.

Dokuz Eylul adheres to best practice requirements set by relevant regulatory and advisory bodies to ensure that its journalism meets high standards of accuracy, ethics, and accountability. This commitment reflects the media outlet’s dedication to upholding professional integrity and public trust.

Adherence to Best Practice Requirements:

Compliance with National Regulations: Dokuz Eylul complies with the media laws and regulations set by national regulatory bodies, such as the Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÜK) and the Press Advertisement Agency (BİK). This compliance ensures that all content adheres to legal standards and media ethics outlined by Turkish authorities.

Membership in Advisory Bodies: Dokuz Eylul is a member of industry advisory bodies and media councils that provide guidelines and best practices for responsible journalism. Membership in these organizations helps the media outlet stay updated on the latest standards and ethical requirements.

Adherence to International Standards: Dokuz Eylul aligns its editorial practices with internationally recognized best practices in journalism, such as those recommended by organizations like the Ethical Journalism Network (EJN) or the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ). This alignment helps ensure that the outlet’s content meets global standards of integrity and fairness.

Implementation of Editorial Guidelines: The media outlet’s Editorial Guidelines incorporate best practice recommendations from regulatory and advisory bodies, ensuring that journalists and editors follow procedures that reflect industry standards.

Regular Training and Updates: To maintain adherence to best practices, Dokuz Eylul provides regular training sessions for its staff on ethical reporting, accuracy, and compliance with regulatory requirements. This helps reinforce the media outlet’s commitment to maintaining high journalistic standards.

Audit and Review Processes: Periodic audits and reviews are conducted to assess the media outlet’s compliance with best practice guidelines. Feedback from these audits is used to make necessary adjustments and improvements.

By adhering to best practice requirements from regulatory and advisory bodies, Dokuz Eylul demonstrates its commitment to responsible journalism and ethical media conduct.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines ensure the ethically appropriate treatment of violent and explicit content, reflecting the media outlet’s commitment to responsible journalism and sensitivity towards its audience. These guidelines set clear standards for how such content should be handled, minimizing potential harm while maintaining the public’s right to be informed.

Ethical Treatment of Violent and Explicit Content:

Minimizing Harm: The guidelines emphasize the importance of minimizing harm when reporting on violent or explicit content. Journalists are instructed to consider the impact of graphic images, descriptions, and videos on the audience, particularly vulnerable groups such as children.

Warning Labels and Content Advisories: Content that includes violent or explicit material must be accompanied by clear warnings or advisories, alerting readers to the nature of the content before they engage with it. This ensures that the audience can make informed choices about what they view.

Avoiding Sensationalism: The guidelines strictly prohibit the sensationalization of violent or explicit content. Reporters are required to present such material with appropriate context, avoiding graphic or unnecessary details that could exploit the subject matter or distress the audience.

Ethical Visual Choices: When selecting images or videos, editors must ensure that the content is essential to the story and does not exploit victims or glorify violence. Sensitive content must be blurred or edited as necessary to respect the dignity of those involved.

Respect for Victims and Their Families: The guidelines mandate that the dignity and privacy of victims and their families be respected in all reporting. Identifying details and graphic depictions should be avoided unless absolutely necessary and in the public interest.

Editorial Oversight and Approval: Violent and explicit content is subject to heightened editorial oversight, with senior editors reviewing and approving such material to ensure it aligns with ethical standards and the outlet’s editorial policies.

These measures ensure that Dokuz Eylul handles violent and explicit content with the appropriate ethical care, balancing the need to inform with the responsibility to protect the audience from unnecessary harm.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines ensure the ethically appropriate treatment of content that features children or other vulnerable people, reflecting the media outlet’s commitment to responsible journalism and safeguarding the rights and dignity of individuals. These guidelines set clear standards for how sensitive content involving vulnerable groups should be handled.

Ethical Treatment of Content Involving Children and Vulnerable People:

Respect for Privacy and Dignity: The guidelines emphasize the importance of respecting the privacy and dignity of children and vulnerable individuals in all reporting. Identifying details, such as names, faces, and personal information, are avoided unless there is a compelling public interest that justifies their disclosure.

Consent Requirements: When reporting on or featuring children and vulnerable people, the guidelines require obtaining consent from parents, guardians, or legal representatives. For vulnerable adults, their informed consent must be obtained, especially if their ability to provide it is in question.

Minimizing Harm and Avoiding Exploitation: Journalists are instructed to minimize harm by avoiding sensationalism, exploitation, or graphic portrayals that could further distress or stigmatize vulnerable individuals. Content must be presented sensitively and respectfully, prioritizing the welfare of those involved.

Contextual and Ethical Reporting: The guidelines require that any content featuring children or vulnerable individuals be reported with appropriate context, focusing on the broader story rather than the individual’s vulnerability. This approach ensures that the content serves the public interest without exploiting those depicted.

Blurred Images and Anonymization: To protect the identities of vulnerable people, images and videos are often blurred, and pseudonyms or general descriptors are used instead of real names. This protects individuals from being identifiable and exposed to further harm.

Editorial Oversight and Approval: Content involving children and other vulnerable groups is subject to strict editorial oversight, requiring approval from senior editors to ensure that it complies with ethical standards and the guidelines of the media outlet.

These measures ensure that Dokuz Eylul handles content featuring children and vulnerable people with the highest ethical care, balancing the need to inform the public with the responsibility to protect those who are most at risk.

Dokuz Eylul’s Editorial Guidelines ensure the ethically appropriate handling of live content, reflecting the media outlet’s commitment to responsible journalism and the careful management of real-time reporting. Live content presents unique challenges, and the guidelines provide clear protocols to maintain ethical standards while covering unfolding events.

Ethical Handling of Live Content:

Real-Time Editorial Oversight: Live broadcasts and real-time reporting are subject to close editorial oversight. Editors and producers are responsible for monitoring the content as it unfolds, making quick decisions to manage any sensitive or unexpected developments appropriately.

Delay Mechanisms: When possible, live content is broadcast with a slight delay, allowing editors to intervene if inappropriate, graphic, or harmful material is aired. This mechanism helps prevent the unintentional broadcast of distressing images, language, or sensitive information.

Minimizing Harm: The guidelines emphasize the need to minimize harm during live coverage, particularly when dealing with violent, graphic, or sensitive situations. Reporters are instructed to avoid showing explicit images or personal details that could distress viewers or compromise individuals' privacy and safety.

Avoiding Speculation and Unverified Information: During live reporting, journalists are required to avoid speculation, rumors, or unverified information. The focus is on reporting confirmed facts, and any uncertainties are clearly communicated to the audience to avoid misinformation.

Ethical Considerations for Vulnerable People: Special care is taken when live content involves vulnerable individuals, such as victims of accidents, disasters, or crime. Reporters are trained to handle such situations with sensitivity, avoiding intrusive questioning or filming that could exploit or further harm those involved.

Audience Advisories and Warnings: When live content may include disturbing or graphic material, viewers are provided with warnings or advisories, allowing them to make informed decisions about continuing to watch. These warnings help protect the audience from unexpected distress.

Immediate Corrective Action: If any ethical breaches occur during live content, the guidelines mandate immediate corrective action, including on-air clarifications or apologies, to address any misinformation or inappropriate content that may have been broadcast.

These guidelines ensure that Dokuz Eylul handles live content with the highest ethical care, balancing the immediacy of live reporting with the responsibility to protect viewers and uphold journalistic integrity.